Re: Proposing COPY .. WITH PERMISSIVE

From: dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposing COPY .. WITH PERMISSIVE
Date: 2015-11-17 07:19:38
Message-ID: CALnrH7qRMxNruWr2-xeLsu6qD=4Hd75OEOudaD8Tu1qWd1Wg7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > In short, it seems that this patch is better rejected. And I am
> > planning to do so if there are no complaints.
>
> OK, done so in the CF app.
> Dinesh, please do not be discouraged by that. Everybody has patches
> rejected, and I know a bit of it :)
>

Sure Michael :-)

Thanks.

> --
> Michael
>

--

Regards,
Dinesh
manojadinesh.blogspot.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-11-17 07:44:41 Re: Question concerning XTM (eXtensible Transaction Manager API)
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-11-17 07:16:40 Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message