| From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Luc Vlaming <luc(at)swarm64(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Paul Guo <guopa(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts |
| Date: | 2022-10-12 05:35:29 |
| Message-ID: | CALj2ACWw0J3usbzgyb7krzdyz+zmewXx-MhNHi2J9nX7jmJtHg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:01 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> This thread has been idle for 6 months now, so I have marked it as
> returned with feedback as of what looks like a lack of activity. I
> have looked at what's been proposed, and I am not really sure if the
> direction taken is correct, though there may be a potential gain in
> consolidating the multi-insert path within the table AM set of
> callbacks.
Thanks. Unfortunately, I'm not finding enough cycles to work on this
feature. I'm happy to help if others have any further thoughts and
take it from here.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-10-12 05:36:29 | Re: pg_checksum: add test for coverage |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-10-12 05:35:01 | Re: Add TAP test for auth_delay extension |