Re: Use "WAL segment" instead of "log segment" consistently in user-facing messages

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use "WAL segment" instead of "log segment" consistently in user-facing messages
Date: 2022-07-19 09:13:59
Message-ID: CALj2ACVTtH9HamzzYTSFuEopeh77homm3mW2fx13QPnsnGAKUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:00 AM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Overall, these patches look reasonable.
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 04:24:12PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > record. Because the entire content of data pages is saved in the
> > - log on the first page modification after a checkpoint (assuming
> > + WAL record on the first page modification after a checkpoint (assuming
> > <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"/> is not disabled), all pages
> > changed since the checkpoint will be restored to a consistent
> > state.
>
> nitpick: I would remove the word "record" in this change.

Done. PSA v5 patch set.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Use-WAL-segment-instead-of-log-segment.patch application/octet-stream 9.0 KB
v5-0002-Replace-log-record-with-WAL-record-in-docs.patch application/octet-stream 17.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Lepikhov 2022-07-19 09:35:22 Re: Fast COPY FROM based on batch insert
Previous Message tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-07-19 09:02:07 Memory leak fix in psql