Re: amcheck: support for GiST

From: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Miłosz Bieniek <bieniek(dot)milosz(at)proton(dot)me>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: amcheck: support for GiST
Date: 2026-01-10 14:56:28
Message-ID: CALdSSPjzwwZHrunm0KVALRjOuP3CA=5+Pxep=d+7OWojFUfM=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 1 Jan 2026 at 17:05, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> CF bot was unhappy about the last version due to obvious bug, PFA new
> version with fixes.
>
> The problem was "DROP TABLE toast_bug;" missing in expected regression output.
>
>
> [0] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6378051304423424
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Kirill Reshke

Attached new version with commit message polishing, and address CF
feedback, which was unhappy due to headercheck

--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2026-01-10-0001-Move-normalize-tuple-logic-from-nbtcheck.patch application/octet-stream 9.8 KB
v2026-01-10-0002-Add-gist_index_check-function-to-verify-.patch application/octet-stream 33.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Japin Li 2026-01-10 16:20:19 Re: amcheck: support for GiST
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2026-01-10 14:34:16 Re: Maybe BF "timedout" failures are the client script's fault?