Re: Document How Commit Handles Aborted Transactions

From: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ahmed Ashour <a8087027(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Document How Commit Handles Aborted Transactions
Date: 2026-02-17 08:17:17
Message-ID: CALdSSPhRtZvY0DNtiwtcNXyvmBzAhMtgzqNK_Ecfdms21c88rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 at 18:31, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Friday, August 22, 2025, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> We can also do ABORT;
>>
>
> Listing commands described as being “present for historical reasons” in the documentation seems unnecessary. We don’t list abort in the “See Also” section either.
>
> David J.
>

I bumped into specific behaviour of COMMIT in an already-broken
transaction yet again recently. So, I moved CF entry to the next CF,
hope this will get eventually merged.

LGTM

--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2026-02-17 08:20:44 Re: Our ABI diff infrastructure ignores enum SysCacheIdentifier
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2026-02-17 08:09:30 Re: Add into REFRESH PUBLICATION parameter exception_behaviour