| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets |
| Date: | 2024-01-27 03:35:16 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm3h4hhdG5fcLRnpvDwuPTndGVPfjqaoS=Y-ojr8S4i0DA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 12:22, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:06 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I'm not conveying the problem this is solving -- I'm happy to go
> > one more round trying to make it clearer -- but if this is not clear,
> > it'd be good to at develop an alternative approach to this before
> > withdrawing the patch.
>
> This thread had some lively discussion, but it doesn't seem to have
> converged towards consensus, and hasn't had activity since April. That
> being the case, maybe it's time to withdraw and reconsider the
> approach later?
I have changed the status of this commitfest entry to "Returned with
Feedback" as currently nobody pursued the discussion to get a
conclusion. Feel free to discuss more on this and once it reaches a
better shape, add a new entry for this to take it forward.
Regards,
Vignesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2024-01-27 03:38:37 | Re: Improving btree performance through specializing by key shape, take 2 |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2024-01-27 03:31:23 | Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs |