Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Date: 2021-11-09 11:15:36
Message-ID: CALDaNm3MGVP_WK1Uuf=BiAJ9PeVOfciwLy0mrFA1JNbRp99VOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 4:06 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> > On 26 Aug 2021, at 16:56, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > The previous patch was failing because of the recent test changes made
> > by commit 201a76183e2 which unified new and get_new_node, attached
> > patch has the changes to handle the changes accordingly.
>
> This patch now fails because of the test changes made by commit b3b4d8e68a,
> please submit a rebase.

Thanks for reporting this, the attached v9 patch has the changes for the same.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment Content-Type Size
v9-0001-Print-backtrace-of-specified-postgres-process.patch text/x-patch 17.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-09 11:31:51 Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2021-11-09 11:01:44 Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby