On Sun, 11 May 2025 at 00:49, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for providing the patch. I have verified the original case with
> the patch on both HEAD and PG_17.
> With the changes in [1], I noticed that even if the consistent lsn is
> set to 'COMMIT' record, we do not get data mismatches or the primary
> key conflict.
> I have also attached the logs for test runs with your changes.
>
> I have also attached the patches which apply on HEAD and PG_17.
The changes look good to me, I don't have any more comments.
Regards,
Vignesh