Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?
Date: 2024-02-01 09:34:19
Message-ID: CALDaNm0Y+JD=MvwHDSHcECZo=nqWO4ZLWjddHgGMiA+JO58m+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 09:56, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 2024-01 Commitfest.
>
> Hi, This patch has a CF status of "Needs Review" [1], but it seems
> like there were CFbot test failures last time it was run [1]. Please
> have a look and post an updated version if necessary.

The patch which you submitted has been awaiting your attention for
quite some time now. As such, we have moved it to "Returned with
Feedback" and removed it from the reviewing queue. Depending on
timing, this may be reversible. Kindly address the feedback you have
received, and resubmit the patch to the next CommitFest.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-02-01 09:49:29 Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Previous Message vignesh C 2024-02-01 09:20:10 Re: Documentation to upgrade logical replication cluster