Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option
Date: 2019-02-28 10:32:17
Message-ID: CALAY4q_TrFN2z1oQcpxCKB5diy+A7m5hhG4VOV5d1BaWpf+qqA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 12:27 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

>
> I'm sorry, I still don't understand what the supposed problem is. I
> don't think it's all that different from what nodeMaterial.c does, for
> example.
>
>
sorry for the noise .Attache is complete patch for incremental approach

regards
Surafel

Attachment Content-Type Size
percent-incremental-v2.patch text/x-patch 41.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2019-02-28 11:26:25 Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-02-28 10:04:50 Re: XML/XPath issues: text/CDATA in XMLTABLE, XPath evaluated with wrong context