Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option
Date: 2019-07-08 07:08:36
Message-ID: CALAY4q8+fXZGgqn+szfUvawhkhydWW81cp0MBcQkgtqaRZKDZw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Thomas,
Thank you for informing me

Hi Surafel,
>
> There's a call to adjust_limit_rows_costs() hiding under
> contrib/postgres_fdw, so this fails check-world.
>

Fixed . I also include the review given by Ryan in attached patch

regards
Surafel

Attachment Content-Type Size
percent-incremental-v5.patch text/x-patch 48.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roman Pekar 2019-07-08 07:33:22 Re: (select query)/relation as first class citizen
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-08 07:04:05 Re: Data-only pg_rewind, take 2