Re: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump
Date: 2018-06-18 12:44:25
Message-ID: CALAY4q-iGLjf6HN56HL4kmCgcSk-_hQLYfJZqy1kkoSCOjRhig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ typedef struct _dumpOptions
> char *outputSuperuser;
>
> int sequence_data; /* dump sequence data even in schema-only mode */
> + int do_nothing;
> } DumpOptions;
>
> The new structure member appears out of place, can you move up along
> with other "command-line long options" ?
>
> Done

regards Surafel

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_dump_onConflect_v3.pach application/octet-stream 7.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Khandekar 2018-06-18 12:49:12 Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-06-18 12:42:36 Re: Possible bug in logical replication.