| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, wenjing zeng <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rachel Heaton <rachelmheaton(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gareth Palmer <gareth(at)internetnz(dot)net(dot)nz>, movead li <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax |
| Date: | 2022-04-07 18:29:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAL9smLA9hJ-B3Eq3fxe7=CG7ESkH+C6sW762fbnVQvMxsxfVSA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:33 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> > You have to either include the pre-requisite patches as 0001, and your patch as
> > 0002 (as I'm doing now), or name your patch something other than *.diff or
> > *.patch, so cfbot doesn't think it's a new version of the patch to be tested.
>
> This patch has been basically ignored for a full two years now.
> (Remarkably, it's still passing in the cfbot.)
>
> I have to think that that means there's just not enough interest
> to justify committing it. Should we mark it rejected and move on?
> If not, what needs to happen to get it unstuck?
I can help with review and/or other work here. Please give me a
couple of weeks.
.m
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-04-07 18:29:44 | Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-04-07 18:12:02 | Re: pgsql: Add TAP test for archive_cleanup_command and recovery_end_comman |