| From: | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-09-05 09:13:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAKcux6=+myF_jdk+kZoQTiYYvJcTMAh+0+DjYRPgX+C0p2rTDw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:08 PM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've updated patch to use an extended hash function (Commit #
> 81c5e46c490e2426db243eada186995da5bb0ba7) for the partitioning.
>
> I have done some testing with these patches, everything looks fine,
attaching sql and out file for reference.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
QMG, EnterpriseDB Corporation
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| hash_partition_test.out | application/octet-stream | 50.3 KB |
| hash_partition_test.sql | text/x-sql | 19.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-09-05 09:30:57 | Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |
| Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2017-09-05 08:44:44 | Re: Allow INSTEAD OF DELETE triggers to modify the tuple for RETURNING |