Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-04-09 03:48:57
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

While looking at the docs in [1], I saw that we still mention:

4. Ensure that the constraint_exclusion configuration parameter is not
disabled in postgresql.conf. If it is, queries will not be optimized
as desired.

This is no longer true. The attached patch removed it.


David Rowley
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Remove-mention-of-constraint_exclusion-in-partitioni.patch application/octet-stream 996 bytes

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-04-09 04:26:54 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2018-04-09 03:15:01 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS