| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2018-04-09 03:48:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f_EZ3jHUDH1zxdauaq_2BGPjpzxJ-noMGfFuz3EehaC3g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
While looking at the docs in [1], I saw that we still mention:
4. Ensure that the constraint_exclusion configuration parameter is not
disabled in postgresql.conf. If it is, queries will not be optimized
as desired.
This is no longer true. The attached patch removed it.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/ddl-partitioning.html
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Remove-mention-of-constraint_exclusion-in-partitioni.patch | application/octet-stream | 996 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-04-09 04:26:54 | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-04-09 03:15:01 | Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS |