Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 11:15, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 06:11:35PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2019-Jun-09, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >
> > > I think it should say:
> > >
> > > | Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should be
> > > | divided is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough
> >
> > I opined elsewhere in the thread that this phrase can be made into more
> > straightforward English:
> >
> > Choosing the target number of partitions THAT the table should be
> > divided INTO is also a critical decision to make. Not having enough
> >
> > What do you think of that formulation?
>
> It originally said:
> | Choosing the number of partitions to divide the table into is also a
>
> So this mostly changes it back.
>
> One could also say:
> | Another critical decision is [the choice of?] the number of partitions
> | into which the table['s content?] should be divided...
>
> I'm okay with it if David is okay making the change :)

Changes attached.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services