| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions? |
| Date: | 2019-05-24 10:00:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9J9H0TFV+7sf1hDZJ3CqmY9t515rWzsgO12c4Y_Aza+w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 17:58, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> + Whether using table inheritance or native partitioning, hierarchies
>
> Maybe, it would better to use the word "declarative" instead of "native",
> if only to be consistent; neighboring paragraphs use "declarative".
Thanks for having a look.
I've attached the pg10 and pg11 patches with that updated... and also
the master one (unchanged) with the hopes that the CF bot picks that
one.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| docs_partitioning_warning_master_v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.9 KB |
| docs_partitioning_warning_pg11_v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.4 KB |
| docs_partitioning_warning_pg10_v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2019-05-24 11:46:20 | Re: Converting NOT IN to anti-joins during planning |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2019-05-24 08:52:49 | Re: Read-only access to temp tables for 2PC transactions |