Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Date: 2019-01-31 03:29:56
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-BfCEJVGc9iSbsQFqryagFfg1yByA5iXuKTX-GAXGEVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've attached a rebased patch which fixes up the recent conflicts. No
other changes were made.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-Allow-Append-to-be-used-in-place-of-MergeAppend-f.patch application/octet-stream 58.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2019-01-31 03:35:00 Re: psql exit status with multiple -c or -f
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-01-31 03:07:55 Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files