Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations

From: Andrew Kim <tenistarkim(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o(dot)tselebrovskiy(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
Date: 2026-02-09 08:42:06
Message-ID: CAK64mnfwyr-6GMRFFW_3a+xXpJxpYymCOygfbr-HUA_7+tQk2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi John, Thanks for v11.
Adding the headercheck exception for the internal header looks good to me.
It would be the right call to fix the CI issues.
The current structure utilizing the semi-private header looks solid to me.
-Andrew

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 3:13 AM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Attached is v11 to fix headerscheck, per CI.
>
> --
> John Naylor
> Amazon Web Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2026-02-09 08:47:07 Re: [PATCH] Add last_executed timestamp to pg_stat_statements
Previous Message Henson Choi 2026-02-09 08:03:23 Re: Row pattern recognition