Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays

From: Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Date: 2017-06-28 21:49:16
Message-ID: CAJvoCuteMR26cDNkHEOOCSctuCKemx6ex1hFR0yuqy7RMjb8AA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Have you met any particular problem here? Or is it just a lot of
> mechanical work?
>

Just A LOT of mechanictal work, thankfully. The patch is now rebased and
all regress tests have passed (even the element_foreign_key). Please find
the patch below !

I don't think it is bug.
>
That's good news !

*What I plan to do next *

- study ri_triggers.c (src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c) since this
is where the new RI code will reside

Best Regards,
Mark Rofail

Attachment Content-Type Size
Array-ELEMENT-foreign-key-v2-REBASED-f0256c7.patch text/x-patch 109.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-06-28 22:23:46 Re: Fast promotion not used when doing a recovery_target PITR restore?
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-06-28 20:19:32 Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken