|From:||Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>|
|Cc:||Asim R P <apraveen(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>|
|Subject:||Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:05 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2019-01-15 18:02:38 +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:13 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2018-11-26 17:55:57 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > Further tasks I'm not yet planning to tackle, that I'd welcome help on:
> > > - pg_upgrade testing
> > >
> > I did the pg_upgrade testing from older version with some tables and
> > exists, and all of them are properly transformed into new server with
> > as the default access method.
> > I will add the dimitry pg_dump patch and test the pg_upgrade to confirm
> > the proper access method is retained on the upgraded database.
> > > - I think we should consider removing HeapTuple->t_tableOid, it should
> > > imo live entirely in the slot
> > >
> > I removed the t_tableOid from HeapTuple and during testing I found some
> > problems with triggers, will post the patch once it is fixed.
> Please note that I'm working on a heavily revised version of the patch
> right now, trying to clean up a lot of things (you might have seen some
> of the threads I started). I hope to post it ~Thursday. Local-ish
> patches shouldn't be a problem though.
Yes, I am checking you other threads of refactoring and cleanups.
I will rebase this patch once the revised code is available.
I am not able to remove the complete t_tableOid from HeapTuple,
because of its use in triggers, as the slot is not available in triggers
and I need to store the tableOid also as part of the tuple.
Currently setting of t_tableOid is done only when the tuple is formed
from the slot, and it is use is replaced with slot member.
|Next Message||Tomas Vondra||2019-01-20 23:43:59||Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries|
|Previous Message||Haribabu Kommi||2019-01-20 23:16:14||Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority|