Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 4:23 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 4:31 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 3:58 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:30 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 5:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, I think we can try to eliminate this entire ObjTree machinery and
> > > > > directly from the JSON blob during deparsing. We have previously also
> > > > > discussed this in an email chain at [1]. I think now the functionality
> > > > > of JSONB has also been improved and we should investigate whether it
> > > > > is feasible to directly use JSONB APIs to form the required blob.
> > > >
> > > > +1.
> > > > I will investigate this and will share my findings.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please find the PoC patch for create-table after object-tree removal.
> >
>

Please find the new set of patches attached for object-tree removal.
Additional changes in patch 0008 only, which are:
1) create-table completion
2) create-table-as implementation
3) drop table implementation
4) 'test_ddl_deparse_regress' test failures' fixes and log files
update. All the tests pass now.
5) code refactoring

Thank You Vignesh for assisting on this.

thanks
Shveta