Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 4:31 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 3:58 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:30 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 5:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Now, I think we can try to eliminate this entire ObjTree machinery and
> > > > directly from the JSON blob during deparsing. We have previously also
> > > > discussed this in an email chain at [1]. I think now the functionality
> > > > of JSONB has also been improved and we should investigate whether it
> > > > is feasible to directly use JSONB APIs to form the required blob.
> > >
> > > +1.
> > > I will investigate this and will share my findings.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Please find the PoC patch for create-table after object-tree removal.
>

Please find the new set of patches. The patches from 0001-0007 are all
the same as May8's version, the patch '0008' is the changed patch. The
changes addresses below:
--with-clause
--inheritance
--owner maintaining
--test_ddl_deparse_regress failures
--refactoring

Thanks Vignesh for jointly working on these.

thanks
Shveta