Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Wei Wang (Fujitsu)" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Runqi Tian <runqidev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, li jie <ggysxcq(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Date: 2023-04-20 08:58:36
Message-ID: CAJpy0uAA0SQ0kPA5bXmrW=32p0bwFCifoKb5OSgteTjGggEkLA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 9:11 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 5:32 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Attach the new version patch set which include the following changes:
> >
>
> Few comments for ddl_deparse.c in patch dated April17:
>
>
Few comments for ddl_json.c in the patch dated April17:

1) expand_jsonval_string()
I think we need to assert if jsonval is neither jbvString nor jbvBinary.

2) expand_jsonval_strlit()
same here, assert if not jbvString (like we do in expand_jsonval_number and
expand_jsonval_identifier etc)

3) expand_jsonb_array()
arrayelem is allocated as below, but not freed.
initStringInfo(&arrayelem)

4) expand_jsonb_array(),
we initialize iterator as below which internally does palloc
it = JsonbIteratorInit(container);
Shall this be freed at the end? I see usage of this function in other
files. At a few places, it is freed while not freed at other places.

5) deparse_ddl_json_to_string(char *json_str, char** owner)
str = palloc(value->val.string.len + 1);
we do palloc here and return allocated memory to caller as 'owner'. Caller
sets this 'owner' using SetConfigOption() which internally allocates new
memory and copies 'owner' to that. So the memory allocated in
deparse_ddl_json_to_string is never freed. Better way should be the caller
passing this allocated memory to deparse_ddl_json_to_string() and freeing
it when done. Thoughts?

6)expand_fmt_recursive():
value = findJsonbValueFromContainer(container, JB_FOBJECT, &key);
Should this 'value' be freed at the end like we do at all other places in
this file?

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-04-20 10:10:44 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2023-04-20 07:11:31 Re: What happened to the tip "It is good practice to create a role that has the CREATEDB and CREATEROLE privileges..."

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Denis Laxalde 2023-04-20 09:03:24 Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2023-04-20 06:53:59 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node