|From:||Andrew Borodin <borodin(at)octonica(dot)com>|
|To:||Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: Range Merge Join v1|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
I'm planning to provide the review for this patch in future. I've done
some performance tesing (see attachment).
All in all, nothing important, everything works fine.
Tests were executed under current HEAD on Ubuntu 16 over MacBook Air.
I observe that:
1. Patch brings performance improvement for specified query
2. Performance improvement of Range Merge Join vs GiST Nested Loop
Join (on Index Only Scan) is between 4x and 6x
3. Performance improvement of RMJ with B-tree index vs GiST is between
4x and 10x
(due to lack of actually competing cases, here I omit T-tests, they
are not that important when speaking about 4x difference)
4. Range Merge Join is capable to consume expressional index with
exactly same effect as direct index
5. Other attributes residing in joined tables do not affect
I'll make code review some time later, probably next week. (I hope
there is no urge in this, since commitfest is in July, or is it
urgent?) BTW fixe typo in index specification of original performance
test (both indexes were for same table)
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
|Next Message||Andres Freund||2017-04-21 17:20:44||Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2017-04-21 16:50:04||Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start|