Re: [PATCH] Small refactoring of inval.c and inval.h

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Small refactoring of inval.c and inval.h
Date: 2023-11-06 10:17:12
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TPSdOpNb_iUTtcmKbOrC8zzws27vyCA-omyJ+TB0621iQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> extern void InvalidateSystemCaches(void);
> -extern void InvalidateSystemCachesExtended(bool debug_discard);
>
> Indeed, that looks a bit strange, but is there a strong need in
> removing it, as you are proposing? There is always a risk that this
> could be called by some out-of-core code. This is one of these
> things where we could break something just for the sake of breaking
> it, so there is no real benefit IMO.

Fair enough, here is the corrected patch.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Refactor-inval.c.patch application/octet-stream 6.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2023-11-06 10:26:44 Re: Moving forward with TDE [PATCH v3]
Previous Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2023-11-06 10:14:25 Re: Query execution in Perl TAP tests needs work