Quick Links

Re: "38.10.10. Shared Memory and LWLocks" may require a clarification

From:	Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To:	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: "38.10.10. Shared Memory and LWLocks" may require a clarification
Date:	2023-05-22 13:19:48
Message-ID:	CAJ7c6TP9rpCujvvnCHwrgUnQeqJ=8NaD0aag-oeFWcg=OZB6zA@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> Unless I missed something, I suggest updating the documentation and
> pg_stat_statements.c accordingly.

Since no one seems to object so far I prepared the patch.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
v1-0001-Clarify-the-usage-of-shmem_startup_hook.patch	application/octet-stream	15.6 KB

In response to

Re: "38.10.10. Shared Memory and LWLocks" may require a clarification at 2023-05-21 10:10:49 from Aleksander Alekseev

Responses

Re: "38.10.10. Shared Memory and LWLocks" may require a clarification at 2023-05-22 14:04:06 from Aleksander Alekseev

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2023-05-22 13:42:44	Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Previous Message	Matthias van de Meent	2023-05-22 13:07:18	Re: RFI: Extending the TOAST Pointer