Re: Define DatumGetInt8 function.

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Define DatumGetInt8 function.
Date: 2026-01-07 14:03:19
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TM4zecvHj0F9Xk-V1gKqjYQOR4EjerTVkrZ18+w-6JN3Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> Hmm, v1 looks good and self-contained to me. Like, anyway, making two
> commits (one for signed Int8 and one for unsigned) here is better for
> sake of atomicy?
> Anyway, I can see there are users of UInt8GetDatum, which are [0] and
> forks of Greenplum. So, I am not super-sure removing UInt8* is
> desirable.

Fair enough. Let it be a separate patch then.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0002-Remove-DatumGetUInt8-and-UInt8GetDatum.patch text/x-patch 3.7 KB
v2-0001-Remove-Int8GetDatum-function.patch text/x-patch 875 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2026-01-07 14:06:54 Re: [PATCH] Provide support for trailing commas
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-01-07 13:54:11 Re: New commitfest app release on August 19th