Re: UPDATE of partition key

From: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UPDATE of partition key
Date: 2017-10-16 08:41:06
Message-ID: CAJ3gD9fyvqqDGp_47nydCR6H2jaOHk==uwP+waSF5r9B7MaNSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16 October 2017 at 08:28, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hi Amit.
>
> On 2017/10/04 22:51, Amit Khandekar wrote:
>> Main patch :
>> update-partition-key_v20.patch
>
> Guess you're already working on it but the patch needs a rebase. A couple
> of hunks in the patch to execMain.c and nodeModifyTable.c fail.

Thanks for taking up this review Amit. Attached is the rebased
version. Will get back on your review comments and updated patch soon.

--
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
update-partition-key_v20_rebased.patch application/octet-stream 111.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-10-16 08:58:03 Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2017-10-16 07:36:13 Re: [PATCH] Lockable views