Re: Parallel Append implementation

From: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Append implementation
Date: 2017-07-05 11:53:57
Message-ID: CAJ3gD9d=P3Jf6nsknjfV=wTnkLTF6FEu6hLaG=ar7ErGK9Y_bQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30 June 2017 at 15:10, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Attached is an updated patch v13 that has some comments changed as per
>> your review, and also rebased on latest master.
>
>
> This is not applicable on the latest head i.e. commit --
> 08aed6604de2e6a9f4d499818d7c641cbf5eb9f7, looks like need a rebasing.

Thanks for notifying. Attached is the rebased version of the patch.

--
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
ParallelAppend_v13_rebased.patch application/octet-stream 57.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-07-05 12:22:32 Re: pgsql 10: hash indexes testing
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2017-07-05 11:20:43 Re: [POC] hash partitioning