Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: json api WIP patch

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Date: 2013-01-07 15:25:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I understand - but hstore isn't in core  - so it should not be precedent
> regexp_split_to_table
> I am not native speaker, it sounds little bit strange - but maybe
> because I am not native speaker :)

it's common usage:

the patch looks fabulous.  There are a few trivial whitespace issues
yet and I noticed a leaked hstore comment@ 2440:
+ 	/*
+ 	 * if the input hstore is empty, we can only skip the rest if we were
+ 	 * passed in a non-null record, since otherwise there may be issues with
+ 	 * domain nulls.
+ 	 */


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-07 16:16:07
Subject: Re: Improve compression speeds in pg_lzcompress.c
Previous:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2013-01-07 14:23:02
Subject: Re: Review of "pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog to use non-blocking socket communication", was: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group