Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again
Date: 2024-01-22 01:29:55
Message-ID: CAHut+PtzLUB5zXHNpgQjT7paJn6EgEz_8y4VThe+GwKPBDTecg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2024-01 Commitfest.

Hi, this patch was marked in CF as "Needs Review", but there has been
no activity on this thread for 9+ months.

Since there seems not much interest, I have changed the status to
"Returned with Feedback" [1]. Feel free to propose a stronger use case
for the patch and add an entry for the same.

======
[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/3358/

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2024-01-22 01:57:02 Re: Support TZ format code in to_timestamp()
Previous Message Peter Smith 2024-01-22 01:22:37 Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down - take2