| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Date: | 2020-10-29 01:10:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PttOYj9YEBhmhvhwz=ccCuAT5wik=8EeuqWc2cGQfY6mA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
FYI - I have cross-checked all the v12 patch code changes against the
v12 code coverage resulting from running the patch tests
Those v12 code coverage results were posted in this thread previously [1].
The purpose of this study was to identify if / where there are any
gaps in the testing of this patch - e.g is there some code not
currently getting executed?
I found in general there seems quite high coverage of the normal (not
error) code path,but there are a couple of current gaps in the test
coverage.
For details please find attached the study results. (MS Excel file)
===
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v12-patch-test-coverage-20201029.xlsx | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 12.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-10-29 01:11:47 | Re: More aggressive vacuuming of temporary tables |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2020-10-29 00:48:46 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |