Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?)

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?)
Date: 2023-11-07 01:33:07
Message-ID: CAHut+PttGh6WzjB6ms_fzsXVkZwXnJA4wOaNYjwebJH0wXQuHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

FWIW, I used a small script to set up the following environment to
help observe the log messages written by this patch.

Node1 = primary; it creates a PUBLICATION
Node2 = physical standby; the publication is replicated here
Node3 = subscriber; it subscribes to the publication now on the standby Node2

~

In the log files you can see:

1. The "physical" message from the walsender of the primary (Node1)
e.g. 2023-11-06 18:59:58.094 AEDT [17091] LOG: walsender process with
PID 17091 acquired physical replication slot "pg_basebackup_17091"

2. The "logical" message from the pub/sub walsender of the standby (Node2)
e.g. 2023-11-06 19:16:29.053 AEDT [12774] LOG: walsender process with
PID 12774 acquired logical replication slot "sub1"

~

PSA the test script and logs

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
ps_setup.sh text/x-sh 2.4 KB
sub.log application/octet-stream 30.1 KB
primarydb.log application/octet-stream 67.7 KB
standby.log application/octet-stream 70.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-11-07 02:15:02 Re: Making aggregate deserialization (and WAL receive) functions slightly faster
Previous Message John Morris 2023-11-07 00:57:32 Re: Atomic ops for unlogged LSN