Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Давыдов Виталий <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
Date: 2024-05-17 04:08:15
Message-ID: CAHut+Ptf+OM_fWTJX4vG_m9zhP7BHby+eeWURMNvJP9xMLB=vg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Kuroda-san,

I did not apply these v12* patches, but I have diff'ed all of them
with the previous v11* patches and confirmed that all of my previous
review comments now seem to be addressed.

I don't have any more comments to make at this time. Thanks!

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2024-05-17 04:46:53 Re: race condition when writing pg_control
Previous Message TAKATSUKA Haruka 2024-05-17 03:34:02 Re: [Buildfarm:63] Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?