Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Runqi Tian <runqidev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, li jie <ggysxcq(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Date: 2023-03-30 22:30:43
Message-ID: CAHut+PtYeam6QmSvHbQ21WHnZA=4QDjWgFvap0Uqd+LgsWMvPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

It seems that lately, the patch attachments are lacking version
numbers. It causes unnecessary confusion. For example, I sometimes
fetch patches from this thread locally to "diff" them with previous
patches to get a rough overview of the changes -- that has now become
more difficult.

Can you please reinstate the name convention of having version numbers
for all patch attachments?

IMO *every* post that includes patches should unconditionally
increment the patch version -- even if the new patches are just a
rebase or some other trivial change. Version numbers make it clear
what patches are the latest, you will be easily able to unambiguously
refer to them by name in subsequent posts, and when copied to your
local computer they won't clash with any older copied patches.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Siddharth Jain 2023-03-31 00:05:30 Question on creating keys on partitioned tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-03-30 20:42:10 Re: recovery long after startup

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-03-30 22:55:53 Re: Parallel Full Hash Join
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-03-30 22:25:45 Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns