Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2021-06-01 23:04:25
Message-ID: CAHut+Pt7wnctZpfhaLyuPA0mXDAtuw7DsMUfw3TePJLxqTArjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Please find attached the latest patch set v82*

Differences from v81* are:

* Rebased to HEAD @ yesterday

* v82 addresses all of Amit's feedback comments from [1]; I will reply
to that mail separately with any details.

----
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1Jd9sqWtt5kEJZL1ehJB2y_DFnvDjY9vJ51k8Wq6XWVyw%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v82-0001-Add-support-for-prepared-transactions-to-built-i.patch application/octet-stream 146.0 KB
v82-0003-Skip-empty-transactions-for-logical-replication.patch application/octet-stream 26.3 KB
v82-0002-Add-prepare-API-support-for-streaming-transactio.patch application/octet-stream 54.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-01 23:24:06 Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-06-01 22:54:00 Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments