Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses

From: Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
Date: 2025-07-03 02:02:03
Message-ID: CAHewXN=yoSp7BFueGCuPc65bJ9HKZHjEoJDz1=N=tQUP0F+zPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> 于2025年7月2日周三 22:29写道:

> On 30/6/2025 04:38, Tender Wang wrote:
> > Do you think it's worth doing this?
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have added this patch to commitfest[1]. I'm hoping someone can review
> > it for me.
> It makes sense to apply. If you return the comment to its place, you may
> reduce the patch size even more.
>

Thanks for reviewing. I returned the comment to its place. Please review
the attached patch.

--
Thanks,
Tender Wang

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-If-we-have-a-single-hashclause-list_copy-hashclau.patch application/octet-stream 1.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shinya Kato 2025-07-03 02:08:22 Re: Extend COPY FROM with HEADER <integer> to skip multiple lines
Previous Message Japin Li 2025-07-03 01:44:57 Re: Fix outdated comments for IndexInfo