Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp>, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Date: 2012-01-26 06:09:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> What happens if we shutdown the WALwriter and then issue SIGHUP?
>>> SIGHUP doesn't affect full_page_writes in that case. Oh, you are concerned about
>>> the case where smart shutdown kills walwriter but some backends are
>>> still running?
>>> Currently SIGHUP affects full_page_writes and running backends use the changed
>>> new value of full_page_writes. But in the patch, SIGHUP doesn't affect...
>>> To address the problem, we should either postpone the shutdown of walwriter
>>> until all backends have gone away, or leave the update of full_page_writes to
>>> checkpointer process instead of walwriter. Thought?
>> checkpointer seems the correct place to me
> Done.

Thanks a lot!!

I proposed another small patch which fixes the issue about an error message of
pg_basebackup, in this upthread. If it's reasonable, could you commit it?


Fujii Masao
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2012-01-26 06:21:47
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new replication mode synchronous_commit = 'write'.
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2012-01-26 05:27:48
Subject: Re: Avoiding shutdown checkpoint at failover

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group