From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs on numeric storage requirements. |
Date: | 2012-03-23 02:36:40 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwER9+z4ooKFriPZYmZFwySitHqJO2vBiH92H6m3thR78w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>> Update docs on numeric storage requirements.
>>>
>>> Since 9.1, the minimum overhead is three bytes, not five.
>>
>> Thanks for the commit!
>>
>> I think that it's worth backporting this to 9.1. Thought?
>
> I thought about it, but it didn't seem important enough to bother with.
Yes, most v9.1 users would not bother that. But some actually did that.
I reported this issue because I received the complaint from them. So I'm
still thinking that it's worth backporting unless the backport needs
unacceptable lots of effort.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | User Fxjr | 2012-03-23 12:45:49 | npgsql - Npgsql2: [#1011161] Bug in NpgsqlCommand while getting readers |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-23 02:12:30 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs on numeric storage requirements. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-23 12:51:12 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs on numeric storage requirements. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-23 02:12:30 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs on numeric storage requirements. |