Re: pgsql: Add various assertions to heap pruning code.

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add various assertions to heap pruning code.
Date: 2021-11-05 15:40:29
Message-ID: CAH2-WznwWU+9on9nZCnZtk7uA238MCTgPxYr1Ty7U_Msn5ZGwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 11:48 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> This generates some warnings on Windows without asserts:
> pruneheap.c(847): warning C4101: 'htup' unreferenced local variable
> pruneheap.c(859): warning C4101: 'tolp' unreferenced local variable
>
> You could move those two variables within their USE_ASSERT_CHECKING
> blocks, for example.

Why doesn't PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY work on this platform? If it
doesn't work on this platform at all, but I'm required to avoid these
warnings all the same, then why do we even have
PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY? If it works in at least some cases on this
platform, then why not in this particular case?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-11-05 16:49:28 pgsql: Don't set ThisTimeLineID when there's no reason to do so.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-11-05 15:33:21 pgsql: Avoid crash in rare case of concurrent DROP