Re: Time to increase hash_mem_multiplier default?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to increase hash_mem_multiplier default?
Date: 2022-02-15 06:32:43
Message-ID: CAH2-Wznsk2Pzav-ACVLeVrXM7zJ78wTA97jLAL1iHsqL0pGJDg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:32 AM John Naylor
<john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't have anything really profound to say here, but in the last
> year I did on a couple occasions recommend clients to raise
> hash_mem_multiplier to 2.0 to fix performance problems.

I would like to push ahead with an increase in the default for
Postgres 15, to 2.0.

Any objections to that plan?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-02-15 07:35:41 Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-02-15 06:16:58 Re: [PATCH] Accept IP addresses in server certificate SANs