On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:32 PM Saul, Jean Paolo <paolo(dot)saul(at)verizonconnect(dot)com> wrote: > But that seems to imply that there was a change deeper in the code that causes this regression on PG10+. > IMHO I cannot be the only one that noticed this, since PG10 has been out for a while and secondary indexes are quite common in practice. > I was wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction on how to further investigate this?
What size is bool_idx, and the other indexes once your benchmarks finish? How do they compare across versions?