Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs

From: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
Date: 2018-11-05 11:42:40
Message-ID: CAGz5QCKpCG6egFAdazC+Jgyk7YSE1OBN9h-QpwCkg-NnSWN5AQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Thomas,

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:53 AM Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It passes make check on Unix and Windows, though currently it's
> failing some of the TAP tests for reasons I'm looking into (possibly
> due to bugs in the lower level patches, not sure).
>
I looked into the regression failures when the tap-tests are enabled.
It seems that we're not estimating and allocating the shared memory
for rollback-hash tables correctly. I've added a patch to fix the
same.

--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-shared-memory-size-for-rollback-hash-table.patch application/octet-stream 1.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-11-05 12:08:37 Re: pread() and pwrite()
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2018-11-05 11:40:55 Re: Undo worker and transaction rollback