Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
Cc: Eyal Wilde <eyal(at)impactsoft(dot)co(dot)il>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)
Date: 2012-04-13 16:43:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Steve Crawford
<scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> wrote:
> If they are permanent tables used for temporary storage then making them
> unlogged may be beneficial. But actual temporary tables *are* unlogged and
> attempting to create an unlogged temporary table will raise an error.

Interesting, yes, I was wondering why PG didn't make temp tables
unlogged by default.

Then, I guess, the docs[0] have to mention it. Especially due to the
error condition. Right?


In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tomas VondraDate: 2012-04-13 17:09:10
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL - Help Optimizing performance - full text search on Heroku
Previous:From: Steve CrawfordDate: 2012-04-13 16:36:20
Subject: Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group