| From: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inserts or Updates |
| Date: | 2012-02-07 17:31:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAGTBQpaR+_1MKOtSSSP+rg=OQLVHW26c1qSaVrvXpVR8TT4jGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ofer Israeli <oferi(at)checkpoint(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks Kevin for the ideas. Now that you have corrected our misconception regarding the autovacuum not handling index bloating, we are looking into running autovacuum frequently enough to make sure we don't have significant increase in table size or index size. We intend to keep our transactions short enough not to reach the situation where vacuum full or CLUSTER is needed.
Also, rather than going overboard with autovacuum settings, do make it
more aggressive, but also set up a regular, manual vacuum of either
the whole database or whatever tables you need to vacuum at
known-low-load hours.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ofer Israeli | 2012-02-07 17:40:11 | Re: Inserts or Updates |
| Previous Message | Ofer Israeli | 2012-02-07 17:27:33 | Re: Inserts or Updates |