| From: | Jelte Fennema <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Deleting prepared statements from libpq. |
| Date: | 2023-06-20 11:42:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQTwEMQL9yEgMLyj3DLWSNaXSYcbge5RomXDvNHDgEp0uA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 06:18, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> The amount of duplication between the describe and close paths
> concerns me a bit. Should PQsendClose() and PQsendDescribe() be
> merged into a single routine (say PQsendCommand), that uses a message
> type for pqPutMsgStart and a queryclass as extra arguments?
Done (I called it PQsendTypedCommand)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v5-0001-Support-sending-Close-messages-from-libpq.patch | application/octet-stream | 22.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Russell Foster | 2023-06-20 11:49:52 | Re: Postgres v15 windows bincheck regression test failures |
| Previous Message | Joel Jacobson | 2023-06-20 10:59:32 | Re: Do we want a hashset type? |