Re: Correct documentation for protocol version

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Correct documentation for protocol version
Date: 2025-06-26 22:04:24
Message-ID: CAGECzQT-10tTkxkT-=8ZZ3L4qpWuKDXnfj5Mi9SSi6o2vwSAsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 11:00, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> If we decide to keep it I think it would be best to have all protocol
> changes on a single page. I'd just put the changes from 2.0 to 3.0 at
> the bottom of the page.

Attached are my proposed changes which split this page into different
sections, one for each protocol version, with the most recent protocol
changes at the top.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-docs-Update-Protocol-Changes-checklist-page-for-p.patch text/x-patch 12.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2025-06-26 22:04:34 Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-26 21:34:00 Re: [PATCH] Use DatumGetUInt32() for dsm_attach() in test_shm_mq_main()