Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Date: 2018-04-03 13:34:45
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I am working on commenting portions of the code to make it more clear
> and readable. Will update the patches with the comments soon, mostly
> this Monday.

Here's set of patches rebased on the latest head. I have added a lot
of comments and revised a lot of code to avoid duplication, causing a
net reduction in the number of lines.

Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_adv_dp_join_patches_v8.tar.gz application/x-gzip 152.8 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anthony Iliopoulos 2018-04-03 13:36:47 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-04-03 13:33:54 Re: Changing WAL Header to reduce contention during ReserveXLogInsertLocation()