Re: proposal: schema variables

Hi

ne 8. 3. 2020 v 19:12 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

>
>
> so 7. 3. 2020 v 22:15 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> napsal:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I fixed the some ugly parts of this patch - now the LET x = DEFAULT, LET
>> x = NULL is processed by more usual way.
>> Statement LET is doesn't switch between STMT_UTILITY and
>> STMT_PLAN_UTILITY like before. It is only STMT_PLAN_UTILITY statement.
>>
>
> I did some cleaning - I mainly replaced CMD_PLAN_UTILITY by CMD_LET
> because there is not another similar statement in queue.
>

another cleaning - I repleaced CMD_LET by CMD_SELECT_UTILITY. This name is
more illustrative, and little bit cleaned code.

CMD_SELECT_UTILITY is mix of CMD_SELECT and CMD_UTILITY. It allows PREPARE
and parametrizations like CMD_SELECT. But execution is like CMD_UTILITY by
own utility routine with explicit dest receiver setting. This design
doesn't need to introduce new executor and planner nodes (like ModifyTable
and ModifyTablePath).

Regards

Pavel

> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>